Plesk panel 10.3 and httpd-devel

[andy thompson]

Hi,

I have Plesk panel 10.3 installed on 64-bit Centos 5

The update has installed httpd 2.2.19 rpm, which is from plesk, not centos
However I also need httpd-devel installing but I cant find an rpm for this version!

Looking in http://64.131.90.31/PSA_10.3.1/update-rpm-CentOS-5-x86_64/ the last version was 2.2.3, not 2.2.19


I am reluctant to downgrade httpd, or to install a non-plesk rpm as I dont wish to break the panel!

Does anyone have a link to a plesk rpm for httpd-devel 2.2.19 ??

 

[IgorG]

Use search before posting - http://forum.parallels.com/showthread.php?t=111846

 

[bilco105]

Igor, what's the point in linking to a thread where the issue isn't even resolved?

There is no httpd-devel 2.2.19 available. If Plesk are randomly deciding to release their own packages, then they need to provide proper support for them, or not bother releasing them at all.

 

[andy thompson]

Exactly!

That thread relates to an older version of httpd-devel anyway

The current version that the panel uses is 2.2.19
However there is no httpd-devel version 2.2.19 to go with it!

 

[IgorG]

Devel for 2.2.19 for centos in attach.

 

[andy thompson]

Thanks! Thats what I needed!

 

[bilco105]

I still don't get how this is a solution? To just provide the file on a forum every time it's requested is just ridiculous.

If you're building your own packages, provide a mirror.

 

[RayMorris]

I still don't get how this is a solution? To just provide the file on a forum every time it's requested is just ridiculous.

If you're building your own packages, provide a mirror.

Seriously this is ridiculous. Right now they can't legally distribute Apache at all and we'll send them a formal cease and desist tomorrow. They have violated our license on Apache, so perhaps before I allow them to start distributing it again I shall demand that they make ALL packages that they distribute available from a central location.

 

[RayMorris]

Seriously this is ridiculous. Right now they can't legally distribute Apache at all and we'll send them a formal cease and desist tomorrow. They have violated our license on Apache, so perhaps before I allow them to start distributing it again I shall demand that they make ALL packages that they distribute available from a central location.

I wasn't very nice about the way I mentioned the license issue. I apologize for being a jerk about it. I was tired and frustrated from working on a server all night, undoing suexec and all. I shouldn't have let that set the tone of my message here. I should have been gracious about the way I brought up the concern. I apologize.

The suexec thing REALLY bugs me because it's SO dangerous on a dedicated server. (Tonight's server was yet another hacked because Plesk uses suexec by default, giving website visitors permission to upload scripts.) Anyway, that's a different topic. I'm sorry I was a jerk.

 

[Faris Raouf]

The suexec thing REALLY bugs me because it's SO dangerous on a dedicated server. (Tonight's server was yet another hacked because Plesk uses suexec by default, giving website visitors permission to upload scripts.) Anyway, that's a different topic. I'm sorry I was a jerk.

I'm curious about this -- please do post about it (separately), as it is an issue I'm not aware of (and is hopefully a mistunderstanding!!!)

 

[RayMorris]

I'm curious about this -- please do post about it (separately), as it is an issue I'm not aware of (and is hopefully a mistunderstanding!!!)

As requested:
http://forum.parallels.com/showthread.php?p=615972&posted=1#post615972