• Our team is looking to connect with folks who use email services provided by Plesk, or a premium service. If you'd like to be part of the discovery process and share your experiences, we invite you to complete this short screening survey. If your responses match the persona we are looking for, you'll receive a link to schedule a call at your convenience. We look forward to hearing from you!
  • We are looking for U.S.-based freelancer or agency working with SEO or WordPress for a quick 30-min interviews to gather feedback on XOVI, a successful German SEO tool we’re looking to launch in the U.S.
    If you qualify and participate, you’ll receive a $30 Amazon gift card as a thank-you. Please apply here. Thanks for helping shape a better SEO product for agencies!
  • The BIND DNS server has already been deprecated and removed from Plesk for Windows.
    If a Plesk for Windows server is still using BIND, the upgrade to Plesk Obsidian 18.0.70 will be unavailable until the administrator switches the DNS server to Microsoft DNS. We strongly recommend transitioning to Microsoft DNS within the next 6 weeks, before the Plesk 18.0.70 release.
  • The Horde component is removed from Plesk Installer. We recommend switching to another webmail software supported in Plesk.

Issue Send limit is also triggered by internal forwarding

W4ru

Basic Pleskian
I have a forwarding (copy) for two mailboxes to a third mailbox under the same domain.
Send limits apply to the all mailboxes.

Apparently the send limit is now reached by two parameters:
1) sent messages via the mailbox (SMTP)
2) forwarded messages to another mailbox in the same domain ( info@domain.tld -> backup@domain.tld ).

In my view, this is a logical error of the function, as forwarding within the domain is not direct sending and thus does not correspond to the idea of SPAM reduction via unauthorised sending (webmail, SMTP....).

In other words: It does not make sense that forwardings are also counted - if messages were sent to external addresses (other domain on other server), I see this as a possible idea.

Even with forwarding on the server itself, I don't think it would be considered a SPAM risk as MOVE... but that is not the subject of my question here.

THX
 
@Bitpalast any stakes on this? It looks like internal forwarding is actually counted towards outgoing mail limits. Doesn't make sense from my perspective.
 
@Bitpalast any stakes on this? It looks like internal forwarding is actually counted towards outgoing mail limits. Doesn't make sense from my perspective.
I, too, believe that internally forwarded mails should not be counted. Wasn't there a Uservoice feature request on that already?
 
Back
Top